Systematic Rigidity and Flexibility

The most important conclusion I have drawn regarding building adaptability, specifically regarding facades, is the need for the potential alteration to provide a functional result as stated in a previous post. I have developed a very basic concept for a facade system, as I want it to be able to form and be formed by the building, its uses, and the users of the space.

As stated in the annotations, the major functional quality of the facade system, besides sun shading, is the manipulation of the spacial size of the exterior versus interior spaces based on pedestrian and user needs. Though I couldn't find detailed information regarding pedestrian traffic in Brisbane, I collected Melbourne CBD pedestrian information to gain a basic understanding of the general pedestrian traffic patterns within an Australian city (as seen in Table 1). This diagram also shows a strong contrast between the use of a flexible facade and a rigid core structure. The facade acts as an extension of the building to create a temporary form/envelope that is interesting and functional while the main structure remains simple to aid in "future-proofing" the building: having a set gridded structure allows strength with limited structural elements that creates ample space for rooms and areas that can be continually redeveloped as future needs evolve. 

The facade system could potentially utilise a sensory detector to alter its shape based on the flow of traffic to keep consistently updated. Apart from aiding in the facade, this information can also be used to determine appropriate functions for the general nature of the buildings itself. 

This image shows further conceptual ideas on the workings of the facade, though much more research and time will need to be put into this idea, along with the rest. As noted, Tim Kundig should prove to be an excellent source for research and ideas as he often includes mechanical features within his architectural designs.